<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>EvoPhylo - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-6550897e" type="application/json"/><link>http://evophylo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://evophylo.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:59:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Exam answer quotes</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/06/exam-answer-quotes/#comment-458030974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;too funy&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bhojpurisongdownload</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:59:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-398235213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. This card offered no explanation about the image. I had to read this article to understand the reasoning behind it. Now, thanks to Dave Lunt, my 7 year old son is a little less confusted&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Flynn Mitting</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KCite plugin for WordPress blog referencing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/11/kcite-plugin-for-wordpress-blog-referencing/#comment-382089570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is one of the most important info for me. And i’m glad &lt;br&gt;reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The &lt;br&gt;website style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent.http://&lt;a href="http://www.mysuperdietary.info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.mysuperdietary.info/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rexcollin91</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KCite plugin for WordPress blog referencing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/11/kcite-plugin-for-wordpress-blog-referencing/#comment-381263448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey there and thanks for your info – I have most certainly learned something fresh and cool from this. &lt;a href="http://www.squidoo.com/3-figures-a-day-with-amazon" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.squidoo.com/3-figur...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andersonmitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KCite plugin for WordPress blog referencing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/11/kcite-plugin-for-wordpress-blog-referencing/#comment-362698366</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats great Phil, I'm looking forward to the new version. I think you are quite right about the reference manager, I don't need that either, I like that KCite does a few things well.&lt;br&gt;I've just realised that one of the things I wanted (hyperlinks out of the Reference section) actually exists. Well the example Simon gives on &lt;a href="http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/461" rel="nofollow"&gt;FuzzierLogic&lt;/a&gt; at least has doi links in each set of reference details. Not sure if I can get that on mine?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:16:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KCite plugin for WordPress blog referencing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/11/kcite-plugin-for-wordpress-blog-referencing/#comment-362332048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad that you liked it. I have a new version in the works which has a few optimisations, is a little more robust and (rather clunkily) allows you to choose your citation style. Later versions will also add support for adding in the full reference details, to fix the problem where there are no IDs. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It was never meant to replace a reference manager; I use one to enter the citations for me!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Phil Lord&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Lord</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-334090381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes it definitely existed Adrian. The problem is really that the picture on the card is not how it was, but rather how someone imagines it would have evolved over the next 65 million years if it hadn't gone extinct with the other dinosaurs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-334064131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and we also have that card&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-334062839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;so did the stenonychosorus exist ___&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adrian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:31:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electronic Lab Books 2</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/03/electronic-lab-books-2/#comment-329588110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article, I enjoyed reading it. Very informative and with something to learn. Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Ramos</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bio-Linux in a VirtualBox</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/07/bio-linux-in-a-virtualbox/#comment-323305428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was struggling to find mention of BioPython in the documentation and list of installed software, maybe that was just me. Anyway the BioPython installation docs give a set of tests that everything is installed OK, and these work just fine in BioLinux 6, so BioPython must all be pre-installed. Excellent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://biopython.org/DIST/docs/install/Installation.html#htoc32" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://biopython.org/DIST/docs...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:17:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manuscript writing with Google Docs</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/06/manuscript-writing-with-google-docs/#comment-323305424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Phil, its pretty much exactly like Word when you're doing stuff. Well, Word before it bloated out to have all that stuff you never use. I would definitely give it a go. Its been really great for me. Worst case situation, if its really just not working for you, Save As Word.doc, and nothing is lost you can carry on in Word as before. For me having 1 document in a collaboration is worth more than the very very detailed track changes Word gives you. If there is some change a collaborator wants to draw particular attention to they can always use the yellow highlighter, or suggest a change in a comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manuscript writing with Google Docs</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2011/06/manuscript-writing-with-google-docs/#comment-323305422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, no idea how I ended up here...&lt;br&gt;Am considering using google docs to put together a final project report and develop a new proposal. In principle all good, but is it possible to view formatting (as it is in Word)? If not, that's quite irritating. I can't figure it out myself.&lt;br&gt;Phil&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Wheeler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paperless Office</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/05/paperless-office/#comment-323305404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about getting a e-book reader with good PDF functionality&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saurabh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:15:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-323305415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Inteligence is a function of brain/body mass ratio AND absolute brain size. In a related group, brain/body mass ratio tends to grow as the body size goes down, so it's fairly common to have animals with a large ratio  but with a tiny brain anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Few have our brain size combined with a large ratio. Dolphins come to mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spharion</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FastTree 1: Compiling and testing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/09/fasttree-1-compiling-and-testing/#comment-323305280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply, I completely forgot to respond!  I now have a nice small tree that belies the amount of data in it :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:11:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FastTree 1: Compiling and testing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/09/fasttree-1-compiling-and-testing/#comment-323305279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike, thanks for the comment. No FastTree2 doesn't have the malloc issue, glad to hear it compiles fine for you. Regarding compilation options, my guess is that either would be fine, I'm no expert though so I would go with their suggestions regarding these options not mine. What a great program FastTree is, I'm still really pleased with it! I keep meaning to write a more modern post on FastTree2.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:44:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FastTree 1: Compiling and testing</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/09/fasttree-1-compiling-and-testing/#comment-323305277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for these instructions, I used them a while ago to compile FastTree on my old Leopard (pre unibody) Macbook Pro and ran into the malloc problem you describe.  I've just reinstalled on my new, shiny Snow Leopard Macbook Pro and I thought I'd let you know that the 2.1.3 version of FastTree on this platform compiles fine without editing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not terribly savvy with compiling from source code, and I noticed that both your method of compiling and that on the FastTree site worked, but there are differences. They use the option -O3 instead of -O2 and include -finline-functions and -funroll-loops. Do you know what effect this has?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike Cox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-323305414</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good for him- my 5 year old thought the same. He was much less impressed with this one than the real dinosaurs and just tends to ignore it now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why kids don&amp;#8217;t understand evolution</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/08/why-kids-dont-understand-evolution/#comment-323305412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just found that card while playing with my 5 year old.  Thankfully, he suggested it looked stupid, and off to the webs we went.  He's now happy "it doesn't look anything like that".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FastTree 2: Timing runs</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/09/fasttree-2-timing-runs/#comment-323305297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;Thank you very much for your very helpful instructions for getting FastTree to run on Mac OS X. You are right that it is nice to have something like this documented online!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there any chance you could compile Fast Tree 2.0? My Mac OS X disks with the developer tools are not on the same continent as I am, and I would love to be able to use this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thank you!&lt;br&gt;KW&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paperless Office</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2009/05/paperless-office/#comment-323305402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bought an HP C7280 Photosmart all in one scanner and printer, really please with it. Cheap, paper feed for scanning, decent OCR, wireless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PopGroup42</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/12/popgroup42/#comment-323305325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After talking to the conference regulars at the business meeting I have set up the site &lt;a href="http://populationgeneticsgroup.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;populationgeneticsgroup.org&lt;/a&gt; to host PopGroup meeting details from here on. I am also going to edit the post to change the link to the correct one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Electronic Lab Books</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/05/electronic-lab-books/#comment-323305177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I posted mine! I'm so excited about this. Thanks for hosting it! &lt;a href="http://directory.itsolusenz.com/submit-link.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Add&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dorla</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:06:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PopGroup42</title><link>http://www.davelunt.net/evophylo/2008/12/popgroup42/#comment-323305323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, so this &lt;a href="http://www.popgroup.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.popgroup.org&lt;/a&gt; site seems to have changed to something completely different and unreadable. I'll post an updated URL when I can find out what has happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Lunt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:17:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
